On 08/08/2017 06:19 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > - Support for a decent set of Emoji (not just the ones you can create using > ASCII chars). > Using Unicode to display them is probably okay, as long as users can choose > them from a menu in the client instead of having to paste them from > KCharSelect. > This, too, might sound like nice-to-have for many, but not having them would > cut us off from the younger generation. Yes, they use them even in a > "professional context". Believe me, I'm seeing it in action every day at work.
I'm not sure custom emoji should be a requirement. That pretty heavily limits your options, and even some of the major chat platforms (WhatsApp, iMessage, Hangouts) don't support this. Unicode emoji support, absolutely.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
