On donderdag 9 april 2020 14:12:36 CEST Clemens Toennies wrote: > On Apr 9, 2020 11:34, "Jens" <j...@ohyran.se> wrote: > > > Hosting of the website also wouldn't be an issue (and if it ends up > > > being high traffic, as long as the content is cacheable we can rely on > > > Cloudflare). People would need to step up to write the content and > > > produce any necessary graphics though :) [...] > > "I will happily make graphics" > > Regarding website/domain/url/graphics: > What potential names would be allowed? > Is anything with "Qt" in it legal or would everything need to be renamed?
https://www.qt.io/trademark/ Qt's trademark policy is unsurprisingly strict, and it seems well managed on top of that. A fork of Qt has to be make a clear distinction in its name, and "anything with Qt in it" will be as misleading as marketing your os as "The Windows Alternative". A fork of Qt would need a new name and its own branding. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org