On donderdag 9 april 2020 15:29:22 CEST Noah Davis wrote: > I've seen a lot of people on Reddit and various chat rooms who are a > fan of Kt as a name.
I'd advise against this discussion at this point, it doesn't belong here, it's a topic that can quickly explode, lead to bike-shedding and distracts from the very serious topic of "what is a good strategy to move forward in this situation?". Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. I certainly didn't want to start such a discussion, just answer a question that tries to draw a line between "what is the part of Qt that can be taken into a fork, and what is not?", the trademark (just like infrastructure and quite a few other things) are owned by Qt, not freely licensed and thus outside of the scope of a fork (so would require investing resources to replace). -- sebas http://vizZzion.org