On Mittwoch, 15. September 2021 21:50:13 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > Alexander Potashev ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed > > under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing > > policy. > > > > Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't > > be allowed by the policy. Is anyone aware of past discussions of the > > KDE licensing policy and reasoning behind this fact? > > It was previously discussed (and sadly rejected) here: > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2019q4/005618.html
Hi, now with the very recent release of openssl 3.0 [1], I think we have to eventually face the question what to do in this regard. But the not too small number of historic GPL-2.0-only files [2] yet is a problem. Cheers, Andreas [1] https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07/OpenSSL3.Final/ [2] tivial script that only covers files with SPDX-tags though: ~~~ grep -r SPDX-License-Identifier --include "*.cpp" --include "*.c" \ --include "*.hpp" --include "*.h" --include "*.cmake" | cut -f2- -d: | \ sed 's/.*SPDX-License-Identifier://g'| sed 's/[ |\*]*$//g'|sort | uniq -c ~~~