> On 2010-12-13 16:48:31, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > How about using vnd.kde.fontspackage instead of x-kde-fontspackage? > > Rex Dieter wrote: > I only used x-kde-fontspackage at aaron's suggestion in one of the > aforementioned bugs, I'm not attached to it. vnd.kde.fontspackage is fine > with me too.
How about submitting a registration of application/vnd.kde.fontspackage to IETF first? vnd.registrations are just "let go". I could prepare the registration form, but some KDE VIP would have to sign it. - Christopher ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/#review9232 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2010-12-13 17:07:48, Rex Dieter wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2010-12-13 17:07:48) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > ------- > > This patch adjusts the kde "fake" mimetype fonts/package so > desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info doesn't complain (using > application/vnd.kde.fontspackage instead). Addresses bugs #235564, #250924 > > > Diffs > ----- > > /trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/kcontrol/kfontinst/apps/kfontview.desktop > 1206154 > /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/mimetypes/kde.xml 1206154 > > Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > confirmed no warnings/errors from desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info > > > Thanks, > > Rex > >