On Monday, June 6, 2011 19:41:15 Maksim Orlovich wrote: > > * all new features will be developed using the recommended git > > workflow > > > > (pending publication; Cornelius is working on that one); > > > > Those rules might seem like a strong departure from what we're used to. > > On the other hand, if you look at them closely, they are merely making > > explicit changes to our habits which already happened a while ago > > during the Qt 3 to Qt 4 port > > These two things don't really go well together now, do they?
a documented git workflow is new, but needed. ditto with the tier/type concepts. the other items are as described in the second paragraph, however. is this problematic for you in some way? if so, can you clarify what that problem is so that we may understand and be able to address it? -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
