----- Original Message ----- > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 02:00:20 AM Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Monday, June 6, 2011 19:41:15 Maksim Orlovich wrote: > > > > * all new features will be developed using the recommended git > > > > workflow > > > > > > > > (pending publication; Cornelius is working on that one); > > > > > > > > Those rules might seem like a strong departure from what we're > > > > used to. > > > > On the other hand, if you look at them closely, they are merely > > > > making > > > > explicit changes to our habits which already happened a while > > > > ago > > > > during the Qt 3 to Qt 4 port > > > > > > These two things don't really go well together now, do they? > > > > a documented git workflow is new, but needed. > > Yes, yes, yes. 100 %. We really need that. For git newbies (like me) > and to > avoid total chaos. And so that it stays possible to contribute to > any KDE > projects without having to figure out for each single project how > they prefer > to use git and branches etc.
That's not what is happening. It's a workflow for the frameworks, the rest of KDE is invited to follow. So you still have to find out for each single project how they prefer to use git and branches. (afaics) Best, -- Tom Albers KDE Sysadmin