On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintsc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne <mp...@kde.org> wrote: >> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love. >> >> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing. >> >> I don't agree that it's (all) easy (although there is certainly a lot of >> "low- >> hanging fruit"), but it does have the advantage that I'm at least available >> by >> email to help guide/mentor. >> >> In addition I will be completing school very soon, which hopefully should add >> some time per day (although that may be offset by the new job I will be >> rotating to soon which will probably involve a longer commute). >> >> Either way, JuK could use some love, there's still someone mostly-active who >> can show interested parties around the codebase and I should have piped in on >> one of these requests awhile ago (but I've always assumed someone else has >> need the help more ;( ) > > Thanks guys. I've suggested him to take a look at JuK. > > > Cheers > Lydia > > -- > Lydia Pintscher > KDE Community Working Group member > http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher >
Hi all, Just wondering, but why is there Amorok and JuK? Surely Amarok can do everything JuK can right? JuK even looks "a bit" like Amarok. No pun intended! Thanx, Mark