On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that > > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their > > point :( > I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion. > > If the signal to noise ratio here is considered too low, then having > the KF5 discussions here > * would have increased the signal, and thereby increased the SNR > * IMO would also have decreased the feeled need for the lengthy > discussions taking place now, since people would feel better > informed, which would decrease the noise, thereby increasing the SNR > > Seriously, IMO it's a "bug" if the core KDE developers don't use > kde-core- devel for communication.
Exactly. Frameworks is the *core* of KDE. What is kde-core-devel then? > P.S. from my POV, I'm not sure using kde-core-devel for the > reviewboard mails is really necessary This is questionable, as those mails are about kdelibs patches, no? Think about those as what they are: contributions to kdelibs that need a discussion. Like in the old days, when you'd post a patch to a mailing list. Andras