On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:54, Milian Wolff <m...@milianw.de> wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2012 02:14:00 Teemu Rytilahti wrote: >> - When getting duplicate backtraces from users the bug entry >> could be >> updated automatically with the version the crash happened, >> this would in my >> opinion be a plus in a sense that "can reproduce in version x" >> entries >> wouldn't flood the comment section. Anyway, this is something >> which could be >> generally available for all bugs... > > I don't get how this is valuable feedback. If I didn't fix a bug of course it > will be reproducible in later versions?! yeah, those people commenting after every release that the bug is still not (magically) fixed :D
>> - Is there a need to keep duplicate crashes in the database, >> maybe for false >> positives? > > hu? I don't get this one. if it's a duplicate then by definition one doesn't > need its information because it's already known?! I would store all crashes, also duplicates - maybe it's a false positive (that's what Teemu is talking about I think) - it's an important fact to see how common a crash is Niko
