Em Wednesday 14 March 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > Em Wednesday 14 March 2012, Thomas Zander escreveu:
> > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 16.39.00 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > Colord - just to mention that - is also not a GNOME project, it's a
> > > > > FreeDesktop project. (Doesn't mean it's "standard", but does mean
> > > > > that it's not GNOME)
> > > >
> > > > Well, no, having something on freedesktop.org doesn't mean it's not a
> > > > gnome project;
> > >
> > > Little semantic confusion here :)
> > > He said it *IS* a freedesktop project. Which means it is not a gnome
> > > project, which seems to me to be true.
> >
> > That controversional. Do you know how freedesktop is working in the last
> >
> > years? If you did then you would not say that.
>
> I agree.
> Stuff which is needed for Gnome is put on xdg, and because it doesn't link
> to libgnome or something like this they say it is independent from gnome.
It was not that I was refering to.
> Just the same way as all the other stuff coming from RedHat for the desktop
> is independent from Gnome ;-)
What happens if the stuff does not please RedHat?
--
Lamarque V. Souza
KDE's Network Management maintainer
http://planetkde.org/pt-br
