On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Thomas Zander <zan...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 16.39.00 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> > Hi! >> > Colord - just to mention that - is also not a GNOME project, it's a >> > FreeDesktop project. (Doesn't mean it's "standard", but does mean that >> > it's not GNOME) >> >> Well, no, having something on freedesktop.org doesn't mean it's not a >> gnome project; > > Little semantic confusion here :) > He said it *IS* a freedesktop project. Which means it is not a gnome > project, which seems to me to be true. > >> it is a gnome project, and it's widening its scope. The >> reason it's used at all is that is is used inside gnome. > > Projects should be judged on merit, irregardless of who pushes it. > If gnome is using it and that makes it grow acceptance, thats a good thing in > my book. Why; *because* acceptance is growing. I don't care if its gnome or > any other player pushing it. > > That said; Cups also depends on colord. And IMO that has a bigger impact than > the gnome components that pull it in. > No, colord guys push CUPS to add API that they need, I thought that's why CUPS depends on colord.
http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/richard-hughes-on-color-management-in-linux-and-gnome Which oyranos don't like to, to be more concrete, use existing protocol / interface. No offense on both side. Just for more information.