> On March 20, 2012, 9:30 p.m., Maks Orlovich wrote: > > Can I presume this change doesn't changer # of conflicts? > >
I don't understand what conflicts you mean. If you mean failing tests in ecmascript262, it does change the number, it recudes the fails by ~50 - Bernd ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104243/#review11664 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 12, 2012, 9:03 p.m., Bernd Buschinski wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104243/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 12, 2012, 9:03 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Description > ------- > > KJS/Grammar: Introduce new non-terminal IdentifierName, > which allows keywords to be used as PropertyName, in Memberexps and CallExpr. > (but not yet enum,export,extends, super, because they have the same value > RESERVED) > > > Diffs > ----- > > kjs/grammar.h 2a006df > kjs/grammar.cpp 32dbeae > kjs/grammar.y d5e835f > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104243/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested with ecmascript262, all keyword cases pass now, except the reserved > ones > > > Thanks, > > Bernd Buschinski > >
