On 2012-08-09 19:57, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Ehm, no. If you don't unreadLine() but readLine() you will now discard
the data previously read in by readAll() and only have the new input
from readLine() which will be empty for sure. The case I'm describing
here is: the process already exited and has written data.
Eike
Huh, what am I missing? Looking in process.cpp from kdelibs, readLine
unconditionally calls readAll, so it should be safe to skip the
unreadLine, right? It works in testing with chfn denied - the kcm
correctly reads the error message.
