On Tuesday, 24. December 2013. 22.03.28 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > As I see it, the nepomuk maintainer says it works better than Nepomuk for > all cases covered by SC. I don't see any reason not to move forward then.
The truthfulness of Vishesh's claim does not enter into it. If we believe it (and I do), it works better *only* for the things that are ported to it. What of applications that are not ([1] as an example of a 3rd party app)? hypothetical: Were we able to make khtml render nothing while preserving api and abi because we decided that webkit was better? Cheerio, Ivan [1] http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=145505 -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun
