Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short:
If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be built without CK support?
Would building without CK support reduce user functionality, and if so
aren't we then essentially requiring distributions that use KDM to
continue using CK until Plasma Next comes along? (we are not
communicating this very if this is the case).
TIA
HS
Hi,
I'm not entirely sure about kdm but for the rest of the code in
kde-workspace (kworkspace, powerdevil et co.), login1 support is fairly
complete and preferred over CK.
(cc'ng Martin who works on login managers)
--
Lukáš Tinkl <lti...@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - KDE desktop team, Brno
KDE developer <lu...@kde.org>
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
