El Dijous, 17 d'abril de 2014, a les 20:04:07, Ingo Klöcker va escriure: > On Wednesday 16 April 2014 12:56:01 Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > So, the choice is between the branch <test> and <test2>. Let me know > > what do you prefer. > > > > For completeness the alternatives in details are: > > > > - branch <test>: no splitters, with dividers (i.e. 4 QFrames in a > > horizontal layout): > > http://abload.de/img/kronometer-no-splittevdklc.png > > This would look much better if you remove the ':' and '.' after the > numbers. IMO the ':'/'.' are superfluous because the numbers are already > clearly separated by the frame border. > > Also you should probably right-align the numbers. In particular, the > hours. For the other numbers alignment probably doesn't matter. > Moreover, I think it would look best if all four frames were the same > size.
I think this is the one that may look the best, agree with Ingo that removing the : and . probably makes sense. Cheers, Albert > > > - branch <test2>: > > no splitters, no dividers (i.e. single QFrame with a grid layout): > > http://abload.de/img/kronometer-no-divideri4kce.png > > Here the ':'/'.' need to stay for obvious reasons. But you should try to > make the spacing between the numbers and the ':'/'.' identical. Possible > solution: Put the ':'/'.' into columns of their own. And right-align the > hours. > > > I'd also get rid of the upper toolbar. You do already have the essential > tools in the lower toolbar and having two toolbars even with differently > sized icons makes the UI look unnecessarily crowded. > > > Just my two cents. > > > Regards, > Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.