On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 16.59:35 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 September 2014 16:44:22 CEST, Eike Hein wrote: > > Exclusively, or do they remain on ReviewBoard as well? > > My understanding is that they do remain on RB as well for now. The goal of > this excercise is to get some understanding on how Gerrit works and whether > it's a good match for frameworks; we aren't imposing some wide-ranging > changes.
Would it not make more sense to trial it using newer / smaller / unstable projects, as it is an experiment? As it stands with plasma-framework in particular, there is now a difference in workflow depending on what *part* of plasma one is working on (framework or workspace). So not only is it now different from the majority of frameworks, it is also "different from itself". That this doesn't follow current documentation (such as it is) for new developers certainly can't help any. +1 for striving to improve KDE's infrastructure[1], -1 for experimenting with significant core repositories that are part of a larger stable release. [1] even if I have my personal doubts w/regards to gerrit's appropriateness for KDE -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
