El Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, a les 01:16:14, Jan Kundrát va escriure: > On Thursday, 11 December 2014 23:20:59 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > You need to understand understand though that changing patch > > review systems is > > not your decision to take (nor mine), we need to have a general > > agreement/consensus when changing systems as important. > > Changing systems is not what I propose, though. What I'm arguing for is > empowering the individual projects to be able to choose tools which work > well for them.
That is something bad, where you see empowering i see needless fragmentation. We need to move together otherwise things will get harder and harder to maitain. > That's very different from saying "whole KDE should just > switch to Gerrit", and I'm not proposing that. Some people have made > themselves clear that no change is going to happen, and I can live with > that. Where was that discussed? Which people is that? Cheers, Albert > I do happen to think that yes, switching to Gerrit would in fact indeed be > a good move for KDE as a whole, but sharing a view is something else than > making people change their systems. If you like RB and you're a project > maintainer, sure, by all means do use it for your projects -- I'm not going > to force you to switch for the sake of my pleasure or something similar. > > I also admit that I would probably feel a little bit sad if Trojita ended > up to be the only project which sticked with Gerrit, but if that was the > general consensus of the community, who am I to dispute the wishes of > poeple doing the actual work? > > I'm sorry if the impression which I managed to create by pointing out what > I perceive to be strong points of Gerrit and weak points of the > alternatives was something different. > > With kind regards, > Jan
