On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:37:31 Christoph Feck wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:07:42 Eike Hein wrote: > > [...] Qt is using gerrit and we intend to remain a major stakeholde > > in Qt development, which means a sizable number of KDE developers > > need to be familiar with gerrit anyway [...] > > Excuse me, but if KDE developers will have to follow equivalent steps > as described at http://qt-project.org/wiki/Setting-up-Gerrit to > contribute, then I predict another big loss of developers.
I have to agree. Whenever I need to do a change for Qt I need to google for how to do it. Including putting serious thought in how the push command must look like, how I need to adjust the examples provided and for which ref/for/foo it has to be this time. This is something which seriously concerns me with the outlook of gerrit. git has a steep learning curve, gerrit adds quite some further steepness to it :-( Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
