El diumenge, 12 de juny de 2016, a les 15:18:03 CEST, Matthias Klumpp va escriure: > 2016-06-12 6:46 GMT+02:00 Yuri Chornoivan <yurc...@ukr.net>: > > [...] > > > > I might misunderstand the whole thing. If it is, just ignore this message. > > > > The typical size of AppData screenshot is ~100 kB. Let's say that there > > are > > ~1000 users that use Discover features to explore KDE applications in a > > release day. They can overview ~10 screenshots in average. This will be 1 > > GB of traffic + load on Phabricator to resolve commits.kde.org links (if > > files are stored in git). > > Well, most distributions cache screenshots on their own and serve them > from their infrastructure (Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu and OpenSUSE do > that), while only a few use the upstream-provided URLs directly (I am > only aware of Arch right now). > Caching stuff allows distros to provide resized thumbnails for smaller > downloads and also allows blocking certain screenshots from showing up > in the software-center retroactively (e.g. in case someone added > non-free copyrighted material there, and we realize that only later). > This is just FYI, I still think a Git-Annex $whatever based repository > of screenshots is better than hotlinking them into Phabricator or > Quickgit.
Noone is suggesting hotlinking into Phabricator or Quickgit. And noone is doign that either (unless someone has proof otherwise). Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Matthias