On Monday 07 February 2011 23:25:02 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 7 de February de 2011 10:05:39 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Monday, February 7, 2011, Arno Rehn wrote: > > > shame if that feature went away I think. And I find it hard to imagine > > > how many QFiles you would need to create to actually notice the drop in > > > performance. > > > > as i said, talk with Qt devs. it's apparently enough of a pain that there > > is a desire to get rid of the file engines in their current form. mobile > > makes this particularly an issue from what i understand. > > Applications that instantiate file engines (beyond the default ones from Qt > -- the FS one and the Resources one) may suffer performance penalty from > 4.8 onwards. > > Applications that don't do that will instead see performance improvements > in accessing the filesystem. If this only applies to the actual file engines, my code snippet shouldn't be affected by this. It only creates a handler, which returns the usual FS file engine. No custom file engine here.
-- Arno Rehn a...@arnorehn.de >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
