On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:20, Rui Maciel <rui.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2011 04:34 PM, Tom Albers wrote: >> Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very disrespectful. >> I suggest you read the CoC:http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ >> >> Best, > > The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates over > time". This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other > dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other > platforms. Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here, but > you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant addition > to KMail. Therefore, it is only possible to interpret the use of this > expression of this particular term as being very disrespectful if you > interpret any reference to any problem that it may cause to anyone as > being very disrespectful. And that isn't true.
There are different ways of talking about problems. Let's try to use the more constructive ones here, please? Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher KDE Community Working Group member http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
