well , in my daily usage i have seen this : firefox renders better webpages :
it's a standard for web browsing , this is an average opinion , i mean there are website where firefox doesn't work well , instead chromium and konqueror do. chromium, is integrated better in kde , for example if you use menubar , firefox it's a nightmare. chromium is very very heavy on ram usage rekonq : it's something that is in the middle it's lighter but it lacks of a lots of stuff and it doesn't render well pages , bank websites etc, so i don't use it . i prefer qupzilla instead of rekonq at least there are user script support ... that means a lots for me ... => http://www.qupzilla.com/ finally my love konqueror , LOL i like it even if it has problems , and btw my italian bank support konqueror so i use it just for that :D i did even a service menu for it , kde service menu video dl , based on youtube-dl and lsof method for those website that are not handled by youtube-dl so i should say i use : konqueror for my bank , and to grab flash files or youtube videos firefox for daily use chromium for some google services qupzilla for fun and to test someting of different from koqnueror 2014-08-16 22:33 GMT+02:00 David Faure <fa...@kde.org>: > Hello Josh, > > I have indeed done a pretty bad job maintaining Konqueror the past many > years. My focus has completely switched to lower layers (kdelibs4 / KDE > Frameworks 5 and Qt). > > I finally took the time to write a blog post about how konqueror needs a new > maintainer and/or a new developer team.... as well as ideas for how the GUI > could be improved / re-thought. > > https://blogs.kde.org/2014/08/16/konqueror-looking-maintainer > > Thanks for reminding me to finally do this :) > > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 > > >>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
