2016-04-21 3:05 GMT+02:00 Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org>: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Elvis Angelaccio > <elvis.angelac...@kdemail.net> wrote: > > > > > > 2016-04-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Luca Beltrame <lbeltr...@kde.org>: > >> > >> Il giorno Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:42:31 +0200 > >> Elvis Angelaccio <elvis.angelac...@kdemail.net> ha scritto: > >> > >> > I think it would be nice to have travis builds for the (mirrored) > >> > repositories that provides a .travis.yml configuration file. The > >> > >> -1. Aside the arguments moved by Albert, I add that the solution is > >> finding ways to help whoever is working on CI rather than offloading to > >> another service we do not control. > > > > > > I don't see it as an offloading. More like a nice bonus to have. If it > > works, good. If not (because it breaks and we don't have control on it), > who > > cares. > > In a way, one could argue this is similar to the telegram case. We don't > > have control over telegram either, but it works for some people and it's > not > > replacing the main communication channels. So it's just a nice addition > to > > have. > > I see it as a point of complication, which will add confusion to our > existing infrastructure. > It will also increase workload on Sysadmin, as projects will have to > request it to be enabled, and undoubtedly people will want things to > be fixed by us or otherwise supported by us once they begin using it. > > We therefore will not be enabling any support for Travis or other > services which integrate with Github. > > All CI integration will be done using our existing CI system, > build.kde.org. > Issues with it's functionality should be rectified there. > > > > >> > >> > >> Also, another -1 from me is because I don't think we should use GitHub > >> more than a mere mirror. > > > > > > It would still remain a mere mirror imho, i.e. strictly read-only. Btw > do we > > have some written rule about our github presence somewhere? It seems to > me > > that some KDE project uses github as their main development platform. > > Urls to those projects which "appear" to be using Github as their > primary development platform would be appreciated. > > Use of Github for anything other than mirror purposes, especially if > it is being pushed as the primary means of making contributions is > strictly prohibited under the Manifesto. The projects included above > can expect to hear from Sysadmin and will be requested to provide an > explanation of their activities there to both us and > kde-commun...@kde.org. >
Sorry it looks I was wrong. I was confused by projects like Calamares and Wikitolearn, but after double-checking with Luigi it seems the former is not an official KDE project and the latter is still in the incubating phase (?). Sorry about the noise :( > > > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team > >> GPG key ID: A29D259B > > > > > > Regards, > Ben >
