El dimarts, 5 de març de 2019, a les 16:45:21 CET, mark rimon va escriure:
> In KDE project in GSoC 2019

In my *personal opinion* you almost disqualified yourself.

Two reasons:
 * There's plenty of literature of how GSOC works, you not being able to use a 
search engine to find it shows a big lack of initiative.
 * You totally misused this mailing list, learning how to communicate properly 
is key.

So please, read about GSOC by yourself, and then if you really can't find the 
answer to a question, send a proper email.

Best of luck,
  Albert

> 
> ________________________________
> From: kde-devel <kde-devel-boun...@kde.org> on behalf of Albert Astals Cid 
> <aa...@kde.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 1:49 AM
> To: kde-devel@kde.org
> Subject: Re: ffmpegthumbnailer
> 
> El dimarts, 5 de març de 2019, a les 0:00:36 CET, mark rimon va escriure:
> > Hello,
> >       i just wanted to ask what should i do to be accepted ?
> 
> You want to be accepted where?
> 
> Cheers,
>   Albert
> 
> > Thanls
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: kde-devel <kde-devel-boun...@kde.org> on behalf of Albert Astals Cid 
> > <aa...@kde.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 8:43 PM
> > To: kde-devel@kde.org
> > Cc: Nate Graham; kfm-devel
> > Subject: Re: ffmpegthumbnailer
> >
> > El diumenge, 3 de març de 2019, a les 17:41:57 CET, Nate Graham va escriure:
> > > Howdy folks,
> > > We have https://cgit.kde.org/ffmpegthumbs.git, which is not very actively 
> > > developed.
> > >
> > > There is also this upstream project 
> > > https://github.com/dirkvdb/ffmpegthumbnailer which appears to be more 
> > > actively developed.
> >
> > How is this upstream?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Albert
> >
> > >
> > > It seems kind of wasteful to have two projects that do exactly the same 
> > > thing, each with few resources and low levels of interest. What do folks 
> > > think about approaching the maintainer of the project on GitHub and 
> > > asking if they want to merge with ours? Or should we abandon ours and 
> > > tell distros to package his instead? Or are there good reasons to keep 
> > > ours separate that I'm not aware of?
> > >
> > > Nate
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




Reply via email to