mandag den 12. oktober 2020 12.58.36 CEST skrev Dag:
mandag den 12. oktober 2020 12.04.04 CEST skrev Milian Wolff:
On Montag, 12. Oktober 2020 11:28:45 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:24 PM Milian Wolff
<m...@milianw.de> wrote: ...
Thanks, but that's looking worse then I expected. I guess
backporting `35e86e964908ee906dde4f0678c16a838e4712dd` is worth
a shot.
@Dag: what do you say, should that be safe enough to do?
No, it will not apply cleanly. I'll do it.
Done, but made no difference, still fails.
Also tried qt_wrap_cpp -> qt5_wrap_cpp w/o sucess.
I'm clueless on windows and can't run any virtual on my machine.
Afaics we have this situation, please comment if wrong:
- The windows build worked earlier, prior to move to invent.
- There has been no changes to the stable branch between the successful
build and the failed build.
- At the first failing build of stable (oct 6), the code that seems to
trigger the failure was the same in stable and unstable except for the
qt5_wrap_cpp.
- There has been some modernization of unstable, mostly Q_FOREACH() ->
for()
I'm at loss of even where to start to look, so I hope somebody can point a
finger in the right direction.
--
Mvh Dag
