Hi all, I just stumbled upon https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,8955.0.html where some Artix user ranted about Plasma going "Wayland-only", and questioning if Plasma would choose the same path as Gnome (which was or will be actually removed from Artix due to hard dependencies on Systemd).
I myself don't use Systemd distributions (Gentoo, Artix and Devuan for me, all with OpenRC), always using X. And I still don't really get the point of Wayland's raison d'être. I'm not really fully into this though. But with Xlibre raising, we apparently will get a X successor that will fix X's flaws without being Wayland – which still seems to be discussed controversially after all this years. So, without having a deep knowledge of all this, and without wanting to start some flame-war: What's the status of Plasma concerning Wayland and Xlibre? Why do we want to take sides to Wayland, even if Xlibre emerged recently? I'd love continuing seeing freedom of choice, may it be the init system or the display server. That's the whole point of what we do, no? Thanks for all insights about this! Cheers, Tobias
