Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday 24 July 2009 08:54:51 am hajma wrote: >> So I am wondering what were the reasons to remove the req. on FOSSlibxcb >> and if someone objects its reintroduction? > > Stefan said there wasn't any point in adding xcb on top of an X server that > didn't actually support xcb. I do not object to its reintroduction if it > gives > us new (useful) features on OSOL or nv115+. I haven't tried any sound-related > stuff recently, not even the login sounds, so I can't say if the gstreamer > support is good enough on those two platforms.
The login/logout sounds work fine on OSOL in the latest builds. If this reintroduction of FOSSxcb is just a workaround for build failures, I'd rather see phonon patched, so that it doesn't fail on missing xcb.h when it shouldn't (if it's really disabled by its configure). hnhn -- Jan Hnatek jan.hnatek at sun.com
