Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 00:25:27 you wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 21 February 2009 04:05:20 pm Lukas Oboril wrote:
>>>> I think we should save our original FOSSgettext, FOSSlibiconv combo to
>>>> prevent another build troubles
>>> I'm really not very happy with that, simply because of the horrors
>>> involved with having three (Sun iconv, GNU iconv, and our own) iconv
>>> libraries and
>> Where is the difference between GNU iconv and 'our' own. FOSSlibiconv is
>> GNU iconv 1.11 AFAIK
>
> The point is I'd much rather depend on the GNU {iconv,gettext} already
> installed on the system and already available from packages (SUNWgnu-gettext,
> and I can't actually find an iconv package so I assume that SUNWgnu-gettext
> actually uses the Sun system iconv) than drag in our own copies again.
> Multiple copies is bad.
Can you please name the problems with Sun's iconv specifically?
Thanks,
hnhn
--
Jan Hnatek
jan.hnatek at sun.com
