Hi, how is the result ? Which build will be minimal and recommended ? I vote for 92.
Adriaan, could you try arrange this requirment for maintainers of Dillon ? L On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Lukas Oboril <oboril.lukas at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Stefan Teleman > <stefan.teleman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Lukas Oboril <oboril.lukas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> It is really need for Nevada ! from my point of view, it should be >>> some build from 9x series. >>> >>> I'm too on the edge maybe, but for people with laptop should be the >>> best build 100. >> >> Nevada builds more recent than snv_92 have toxic bits in the 32-bit >> SPARC C runtime which make C++ dysfunctional. So, if you decide to use >> builds more recent than snv_92, things won't work at all. Use at your >> own risk. >> > > I'm sorry , I'm only X86 man :) I have no access to SPARC machine. My > sparc knowledges are minimal. So the recomendation might be build 92. > > I'm using Nevada only on my Core2Duo laptop (recently b97 > upgrading > to b100). Ultra20m2 use S10U5. > > Luc > > >> --Stefan >> >> -- >> Stefan Teleman >> KDE e.V. >> stefan.teleman at gmail.com >> > > > > -- > Lukas 'Luc' Oboril > IRC nickname: luc^ at freenode > > > When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with > creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotions, > creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity. > Dale Carnegie > -- Lukas 'Luc' Oboril IRC nickname: luc^ at freenode When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotions, creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity. Dale Carnegie
