On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 16:52:47 Ben Taylor wrote:
>> Not my errors.  HAL and Gstreamer are still not populating correctly.
>
> Populating? Is that wrt. the package file list?

No.  the dependencies.

Cups - FOSS or SUNW (cupsr)
Gstreamer - FOSS or SUNW (gnome-media)
gst-plugins-base - FOSS or SUNW (gnome-media)
Hal - FOSS or SUNW


RIght now, I'm having ot build those dependencies by hand in
order to get qt-4.4.1 to build correctly (and as I've pointed out
qconfig.h doesn't get populated to foss/qt4/include/Qt and
foss/qt4/include/QtCore

I also suspect that empty variables (gst_plugins_base and xstuff)
are also causing the error in the spec file, which is why I published
my patch to cdeps.inc to insure that there are no Dependencies
that don't actually resolve to something.


> Actually, this is one reason I would want *more* explicit plists, even, and
> avoid wildcards as much as possible -- it catches issues caused by secretly
> failing builds or missing components.

I did one of these for gnutls, because the version of texinfo in S10U5
doesn't properly build the info files.  Which is one of the reasons I
built a texinfo package, to update it past where S10U5's version
is.

> Maybe we should just patch the plist to match what S10U5 produces, since we're
> not going to be using either of these packages (right?) with nv.

Ben

Reply via email to