Lukas Oboril wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 5:34 PM, michael schuster <Michael.Schuster at sun.com> wrote: >> Shawn Walker wrote: >>> On 08/11/2007, michael schuster <Michael.Schuster at sun.com> wrote: >>>> we must make sure that we don't repeat the trap gnu configure leads into, >>>> ie. confusing the *build* machine with the *run* machine. I'm fairly >>>> certain the move to cmake has taken care of most of this, but I want to >>>> make quite certain that the scheme Lukas suggests doesn't affect the >>>> installability of the resulting stuff on other machines.
But that depends on CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS, right ? I don't believe we should be limiting the build environment in /opt/kdebld. If someone wants to build highly optimized binaries for a very specific hardware architecture, they should be allowed to do so, just as someone else should be allowed to produce hardware-neutral (within constraints) binaries. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman Sun Microsystems, Inc. Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM
