On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Stefan Teleman wrote: > On 8/25/07, Alan DuBoff <alan.duboff at sun.com> wrote: > >> I would fear we put ourselves into a similar situation as having >> incompatible ABIs between SunStudio and gcc. I'm not sure that's a good >> situation for us to be in. Not that I have a solution to the problem, but >> it doesn't seem to solve the heart of the problem at hand, rather create >> one of it's own. > > Unless RogueWave/Apache's Standard C++ Library becomes integrated in > Solaris, and it is one of the libraries available for building and > linking software, we dot have a lot of choice. > > Maybe this would be possible. > > The problem as it stands today is that noone at KDE or at BOOST is > willing to patch their code to comply with libCstd.so's lack of > compliance. :-)
But you mentioned before that we could hack around the problems with BOOST, but that it was ugly. Was this one of the items you mentioned to the tools folks? Seems that getting BOOST to compile with Studio is not a bad option, should they be able to resolve it in a decent timeframe. -- Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
