> Am Freitag, 28. Juni 2013, 19:17:59 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: > > ???????? Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:49:15 +0300, Myriam Schweingruber > > > > <myriam at kde.org>: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Yuri Chornoivan <yurchor at ukr.net> > > > wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> As you might know, we have a new rendering of KDE mascots [1]. > > >> > > >> Is it be appropriate to use them for documentation PDFs? > > >> > > >> KMail docs with the new mascots: > > >> > > >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/55247264/kmail.pdf > > > > > > Looks akward TBH. KMail is a professional tool, having toy mascots > > > might be OK for Edu or Games, it really looks very unprofessional for > > > a handbook of a software that also targets enterprises. I wouldn't put > > > the old Konqi in there either, for the same reasons. > > > > > >> KMail docs with the current logo: > > >> > > >> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdepim/kmail/kmail.pdf > > > > > > The logo looks borked on my side, what happend to the KMail Icon? > > > There should be a scalable version of the Oxygen icon, no? Seems > > > certainly more suitable than toy figures. > > > > > > > > > Regards, Myriam > > > > Ok. So is it suitable to make the rules as follows: > > > > 1. The application logo if it exists. > > 2. The Oxygen logo for the applications without logos and KCMs. > > > fine for me. > > -- > Burkhard L?ck
Ok. Now all PDFs should have an application icon on the frontpage and KDE logo if the application does not have an icon. Hope I did not break too much and everything will be online on the next Friday. Not all PDFs for icons are ready now but I will try to have a complete set as soon as possible (any help will be appreciated). Best regards, Yuri
