???????? Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:49:15 +0300, Myriam Schweingruber <myriam at kde.org>:
> Hi all, > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Yuri Chornoivan <yurchor at ukr.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As you might know, we have a new rendering of KDE mascots [1]. >> >> Is it be appropriate to use them for documentation PDFs? >> >> KMail docs with the new mascots: >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/55247264/kmail.pdf > > Looks akward TBH. KMail is a professional tool, having toy mascots > might be OK for Edu or Games, it really looks very unprofessional for > a handbook of a software that also targets enterprises. I wouldn't put > the old Konqi in there either, for the same reasons. > >> KMail docs with the current logo: >> >> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdepim/kmail/kmail.pdf > > The logo looks borked on my side, what happend to the KMail Icon? > There should be a scalable version of the Oxygen icon, no? Seems > certainly more suitable than toy figures. > > > Regards, Myriam > Ok. So is it suitable to make the rules as follows: 1. The application logo if it exists. 2. The Oxygen logo for the applications without logos and KCMs. ?
