ervin added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> dfaure wrote in kcoreconfigskeleton.h:448 > So this KF6 TODO is to make those methods virtual? It's a bit unclear to me... > > I'm asking because: if the solution is something else then maybe it can be > done already for those new methods. That's my understanding to have them virtuals in KF6 indeed, that was introduced by David Edmundson a little while ago. This is necessary because of the way KConfigSkeletonItem is done and because KConfigCompilerSignallingItem is basically a decorator. REPOSITORY R237 KConfig REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27059 To: crossi, ervin, dfaure, #frameworks Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns