ognarb added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> cordlandwehr wrote in kcfg.xsd:20 > Actually, I though quite a time about this and at the end did a comparison of > the permissions specifically provided by this statement: use, copy and modify > (yet there is no explicit statement of sublicensing and combining with other > works). That -- in my understanding -- is the legal equivalent to the BSD-2 > clause. However, the statement is quite different than the usual BSD 2 > Clauses. but I am not aware of any license that is phrased in exactly this > statement. > > What is your opinion? Otherwise, I would also be fine with omitting it from > the change for now and I could contact the authors if they agree and then do > this change atomically later. Searching in google, this looks like a standard license text for dtd files. REPOSITORY R237 KConfig REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27601 To: cordlandwehr Cc: ognarb, cgiboudeaux, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
