On 08 Jul 2014, at 01:15 , Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > Well, you'd get an application for managing processes, it's cool, but then > you need to provide a backend for it. yep
> IMHO, you have projects much more interesting to port than ksysguard. I guess, it was just something I picked from the kf5-qt5 dependency list. I guess it would be good to figure out which frameworks/applications would be best to include next in the OSX/CI systems runs! The current status of it can be seen here: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDEMacPortsCI/Status#KF5softwarebeyondthebasicframeworks _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
