On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Marko Käning <mk-li...@email.de> wrote:
> On 08 Jul 2014, at 01:15 , Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > > Well, you'd get an application for managing processes, it's cool, but > then you need to provide a backend for it. > yep > > > IMHO, you have projects much more interesting to port than ksysguard. > I guess, it was just something I picked from the kf5-qt5 dependency list. > > > I guess it would be good to figure out which frameworks/applications would > be best to include next in the OSX/CI systems runs! > > The current status of it can be seen here: > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDEMacPortsCI/Status#KF5softwarebeyondthebasicframeworks Just a thought, you can consider porting applications in KDE Edu [1], this way you can start thinking what you want the end deliverables to look like while the rest of the community keep porting the big applications. Aleix [1] http://community.kde.org/KDEEdu/RouteToKF5
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
