Hi René, On 22 Oct 2015, at 19:24 , René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not exactly, no. The patch was rejected in the presented form, but we were > invited to file a bug report (I think it's > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-44473). Here we (me, IIRC) managed to > make the case for special needs by MacPorts and family. > My understanding is that the door is still open for a QSP patch that does not > alter the default QSP behaviour, which is exactly what my patch does (i.e. it > requires activation).
ok, you're right. >> Could it be, that we have to introduce a QSP patch in MacPorts’ qt5-mac to >> revert back to the Linuxy way of XDG paths? > > Have you forgotten I'm working on that, and that I actually created a qt5-kde > port so that (y)our KF5 ports could depend on a port with the required > patch(es) and install layout? How could I forget that? ;-) I was merely trying to trigger the discussion! Greets, Marko _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
