> On Feb. 29, 2016, 2:15 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Can you check the latest master - whether it builds - I've removed 
> > model_updaters from the ActivitiesModel.
> > 
> > I have to say that I really hate MSVC...

Yes, latest master builds unmodified. Thanks. Closing.

> I have to say that I really hate MSVC...

I decidedly do not disagree... (But it appears Qt is determined to force it on 
us in the mid term, by way of QtWebEngine, which does not support compilation 
using MinGW.)


- Thomas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127187/#review92909
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 29, 2016, 1:54 p.m., Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127187/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 29, 2016, 1:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdewin and Ivan Čukić.
> 
> 
> Repository: kactivities
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MSVC (2013) complains that beginResetModel(), etc. are protected. This patch 
> allows the code to compile. It is clearly not very elegant, but both my 
> templating- and MSVC-foo is extremely limited. Not sure, if there is a better 
> fix.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/lib/activitiesmodel.h 7258b73 
>   src/lib/activitiesmodel.cpp af30f59 
>   src/lib/activitiesmodel_p.h dfa861b 
>   src/utils/model_updaters.h ae8e279 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127187/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Now compiles with MSVC 2013 on Windows.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to