On Monday, 17. October 2005 21:11, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Rereading the top of the mail I guess you do really mean LOCALBASE, but I > > fail to see what tinyq is allegedly looking for in /usr/local. Is the > > pkg_add failing the error I should be looking at at all? I really can't > > tell what's wrong. > > Look for /usr/local in the log I sent you. You shouldn't see it, but > it's there (because the port hard-codes it), and this is why it's > failing.
Ah, so it's about PREFIX-cleanness after all. I'm sorry, I have the "dependencies are in *BASE, port goes into PREFIX" so internalized, I didn't make the connection. :P Funny nobody noticed this before, the port is pretty old... so old in fact, I didn't even know we maintain it. Should be fixed now. Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp0oI2UkhWyF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
