On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:44:20PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday, 17. October 2005 21:11, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Rereading the top of the mail I guess you do really mean LOCALBASE, but I > > > fail to see what tinyq is allegedly looking for in /usr/local. Is the > > > pkg_add failing the error I should be looking at at all? I really can't > > > tell what's wrong. > > > > Look for /usr/local in the log I sent you. You shouldn't see it, but > > it's there (because the port hard-codes it), and this is why it's > > failing. > > Ah, so it's about PREFIX-cleanness after all. I'm sorry, I have the > "dependencies are in *BASE, port goes into PREFIX" so internalized, I didn't > make the connection. :P
In this case the /usr/local mentioned in the port build (-I/usr/local/include, etc) should indeed be LOCALBASE, since they're looking for the port dependencies there. Thanks, Kris
pgp6praGhlbcX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
