On Friday, 4. November 2005 04:29, Chris Howells wrote: > On Friday 04 November 2005 01:54, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: > > I am wondering what the ETA for an initial port of Qt 4.0 is. Don't get > > me wrong - I am not trying to rush anybody. It's just that I will be > > starting on my master's thesis next week and I need to code it using > > that version of Qt. So, I am trying to figure out whether I need to > > install Linux on a second partition for now or if I can expect Qt 4.0 to > > be available for FreeBSD soon. > > Surely you can just compile it yourself outside of ports? Gotta be easier > than installing another OS.
It sure is a whole damn lot easier than trying to make it fit into the ports framework. :-( Qt4 won't be in ports by next week, that much is for sure. I will make an effort to get it in before the end of november. However: There's a good chance that it will partially conflict with Qt3, so compiling it outside of ports into a different prefix is still a good idea - and it's not hard to do at all either. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp7OqLFmdmHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
