On 12/15/05, Lauri Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 18:00, James Earl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was just curious whether any thought has been given to splitting up
> > KDE so that individual applications could be installed if desired?
> > Something similar to what's been done with the php port perhaps?  For
> > example, instead of have to install all of koffice, one could choose
> > to just install KWord.
> >
> > Something that I've always thought would be great is when you go to
> > install the koffice/kgraphics/knetwork/etc. port, you would be
> > prompted to select the applications you'd like to build within that
> > port.
>
> Those applications that have difficult dependencies, or support specific
> hardware, or just plain make the most sense, are already split up.   Some of
> the others get slowly split up as time goes by, or when enough people request
> a specific application be split out.
>
> In the long run however, it's a time sink to do and maintain, and we haven't
> the resources, nor really the will to do it.  Nor is the demand there - in
> the past 5 years or so, I can count on my fingers the number of people who
> have actually asked for this to be done on a global scale.  About an equal
> number of people have taken the time to seek us out and thank us for *not*
> doing it, because it's very easy to track KDE's dependencies, and they don't
> have to figure out how to upgrade 430 separate libraries in the right order
> to get a new version of something to run without breaking all their other
> software.  So, we'd still have to keep those folks happy.

Thanks for the response.  What you've said makes good sense.  Now, I
guess I might as well get this over with... thanks for not splitting
it up!  :)

James
_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
[email protected]
http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd

Reply via email to