On Saturday 21 October 2006 15:53, Heiner wrote: > On Saturday 21 October 2006 11:16, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > If the upgrade is to 0.91, then (from memory, and without testing) > > the bindings end up in Qt 4.2 instead. > > Hi! > > According to > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/dbus/Makefile.diff? >r1=1.53&r2=1.54&f=h > > dbus made a jump from 0.62 to 0.93. This jump removed the qt support, > as > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/dbus/pkg-plist.diff >?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&f=h > > shows. I am just wondering if anybody needs the qt bindings for dbus. > I just tried to enable hal support for k3b and that required (besides > hal and dbus) the qt bindings for dbus. If these will go away with > the next portupgrade, I will not start doing anything here.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fDBusBindings See particularly the section on Qt3 bindings. I haven't tried them, but I guess if they work a port could be made of them. A. -- Andy Fawcett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In an open world without walls and fences, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://kf.liquidneon.com/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
