Andy Fawcett schrieb: > On Saturday 21 October 2006 15:53, Heiner wrote: > >> On Saturday 21 October 2006 11:16, Adriaan de Groot wrote: >> >>> If the upgrade is to 0.91, then (from memory, and without testing) >>> the bindings end up in Qt 4.2 instead. >>> >> Hi! >> >> According to >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/dbus/Makefile.diff? >> r1=1.53&r2=1.54&f=h >> >> dbus made a jump from 0.62 to 0.93. This jump removed the qt support, >> as >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/dbus/pkg-plist.diff >> ?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&f=h >> >> shows. I am just wondering if anybody needs the qt bindings for dbus. >> I just tried to enable hal support for k3b and that required (besides >> hal and dbus) the qt bindings for dbus. If these will go away with >> the next portupgrade, I will not start doing anything here. >> > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fDBusBindings > > See particularly the section on Qt3 bindings. I haven't tried them, but > I guess if they work a port could be made of them. > I'll do them together with KDE 3.5.5 (expect that to take a little longer again :).
Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://kf.liquidneon.com/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
