Hi all, I'm looking at the state of Qt 5.6 in trunk and fixing/polishing the rough edges I stumble upon.
One of the ugly things I see is the WRKSRC logic in bsd.qt.mk because devel/qt5-qdoc is setting QT_DIST to multiple values in order to install both the qdoc tool (from qttools) and the .qdocconf files from qtbase. The .qdocconf files are static and architecture-independent, so I'd like to either ship them with qt5-core itself or create a separate port for them which qt5-qdoc would depend on. Both solutions would fix the "I do not want to depend on misc/qt5-doc" and "the WRKSRC hacks are ugly" issues. Does anyone favor one approach over the other? _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information