Moin moin I think I favor the creation of a new qt5-doc-globalfiles [or something similar/sensible] port rather than adding them in qt5-core.
mfg Tobias On 18 July 2016 at 00:02, Raphael Kubo da Costa <rak...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > The reason is that tcberner and I want to re-work most of the qttools > ports > > that are currently split up into several ones to get them merged into as > few > > ports as possible and reasonable. Then look at the issue of the qdocconf > files > > again, if we open a bug report on Qt to have these files moved to > qttools as > > well, which would solve our problem at the source. > > I don't see how those two issues are related: moving the .qdocconf files > to another port, be it a new one or qt5-core, does not prevent the > creation of a qt5-tools port that just has to depend on it. > _______________________________________________ > kde-freebsd mailing list > kde-freebsd@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd > See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information >
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
